OpenSSL 1.1.1g Windows build slow rsa tests
Michael.Wojcik at microfocus.com
Thu Jan 21 14:27:54 UTC 2021
> From: openssl-users <openssl-users-bounces at openssl.org> On Behalf Of Dr Paul
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 January, 2021 19:28
> I'd suggest giving a build without the no-asm option a try. The
> performance difference is usually quite significant.
I agree. It just doesn't explain what Dan's email claims.
> Statis vs dynamic builds wouldn't normally be associated with such a
> large difference. If the difference were routinely this large, nobody
> would use dynamic linking.
In this case it's the static-linked version which is slower. But I'd be surprised if that's actually the cause.
More information about the openssl-users