Reg slowness seen in openssl 1.1.1

[ramakrushna mishra]

Hi ,

The results on a AIX machine looks more bad If I am interpreting them
correctly.

openssl 1.1.0e :
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192
bytes  16384 bytes
sha1             65019.16k   151552.49k   266107.41k   337113.93k
 360792.93k   364102.89k


openssl 1.1.1 :
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192
bytes  16384 bytes
sha1             10641.28k    21433.09k    38464.85k    48496.92k
49381.38k    51755.48k

could any one please confirm if my interpretation is correct ?
I doubt any issue with openssl 1.1.1 version with such wider user base.
How to debug this further ?

Thanks and Regards,
Ram Krushna


On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 5:59 AM ramakrushna mishra <rama.krushna7 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Could anyone please help me wth it.
>
> Following are sslc speed results for SHA1.
>
> sslc speed sha1
> Doing sha1 for 3s on 16 size blocks: 16858430 sha1's in 2.98s
> Doing sha1 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 14147528 sha1's in 3.00s
> Doing sha1 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 6436755 sha1's in 2.99s
> Doing sha1 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 2055335 sha1's in 3.00s
> Doing sha1 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 266404 sha1's in 2.99s
> Doing sha1 for 3s on 16384 size blocks: 152376 sha1's in 3.00s
> OpenSSL 1.1.0e  16 Feb 2017
> built on: reproducible build, date unspecified
> options:bn(64,64) rc4(16x,int) des(int) aes(partial) idea(int)
> blowfish(ptr)
> compiler: gcc -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DNDEBUG -DOPENSSL_THREADS
> -DOPENSSL_NO_STATIC_ENGINE -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2
> -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m
> -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DRC4_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM
> -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DGHASH_ASM -DECP_NISTZ256_ASM -DPADLOCK_ASM
> -DOPENSSLDIR="\"/vobs_prgs/tools/linuxx86_64/openssl/install\""
> -DENGINESDIR="\"/vobs_prgs/tools/linuxx86_64/openssl/install/lib/engines-1.1\""
> The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
> type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192
> bytes  16384 bytes
> sha1             90515.06k   301813.93k   551106.78k   701554.35k
>  729893.50k   832176.13k
>
>
>
> sslc speed sha1
> Doing sha1 for 3s on 16 size blocks: 16939397 sha1's in 2.99s
> Doing sha1 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 11489920 sha1's in 3.00s
> Doing sha1 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 5316410 sha1's in 2.99s
> Doing sha1 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 2006834 sha1's in 3.00s
> Doing sha1 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 273661 sha1's in 2.98s
> Doing sha1 for 3s on 16384 size blocks: 150159 sha1's in 2.99s
> OpenSSL 1.1.1  11 Sep 2018
> built on: Tue Feb 12 18:18:22 2019 UTC
> options:bn(64,64) rc4(16x,int) des(int) aes(partial) idea(int)
> blowfish(ptr)
> compiler: gcc -fPIC -pthread -m64 -Wa,--noexecstack -fPIC
> -DOPENSSL_USE_NODELETE -DL_ENDIAN -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_CPUID_OBJ
> -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5
> -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DKECCAK1600_ASM
> -DRC4_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DGHASH_ASM
> -DECP_NISTZ256_ASM -DX25519_ASM -DPADLOCK_ASM -DNDEBUG -fPIC
> The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
> type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192
> bytes  16384 bytes
> sha1             90645.60k   245118.29k   455184.27k   684999.34k
>  752292.25k   822811.06k
>
> Does not this  means 1.1.1 process lesser number of bytes per second
> compared to 1.1.0e ?
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Ram Krushna
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:46 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz at akamai.com> wrote:
>
>> *>  *Could you please look into the program and let me know if anything
>> I am doing wrong ?
>>
>> > Or else What could be the issue ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Sorry, no not me.  Maybe someone else on the list has ideas.
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20190510/fa7664d5/attachment.html>