[openssl-dev] We're working on license changes
Jonathan Larmour
jifl at eCosCentric.com
Tue Aug 4 03:40:06 UTC 2015
On 31/07/15 19:19, Brian Smith wrote:
>
> Also, I question the need for people to sign a CLA to contribute to OpenSSL.
> OpenSSL has been very successful for decades without a CLA requirement. Lots
> of other projects are extremely successful without a CLA. A CLA seems unnecessary.
More importantly in my mind, I find it difficult to imagine at this point that
OpenSSL will verifiably be able to obtain a CLA from every person who has
*ever* contributed to OpenSSL code.
But I agree with others that if you can somehow manage it, then choosing
something (L)GPLv2 compatible would be vastly better.
Jifl
--
eCosCentric Limited http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos experts
Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 1223 245571
Registered in England and Wales: Reg No 4422071.
------["Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere"]------ Opinions==mine
More information about the openssl-dev
mailing list