[openssl-dev] We're working on license changes

[Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL]

How about getting a second opinion?

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.
  Original Message  
From: Matt Caswell
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 03:56
To: openssl-dev at openssl.org
Reply To: openssl-dev at openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] We're working on license changes



On 04/08/15 00:37, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> I also don't get why a CLA is required, overall.

It's not something I'm thrilled about either. However we have been
receiving legal advice. That advice tells us that we should be putting
in place a CLA.

Matt

_______________________________________________
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4350 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-dev/attachments/20150804/0fcd52d8/attachment-0001.bin>