[openssl-dev] weird linker warnings on solaris 11

[Erik Forsberg]

just updated to developer studio 12.5 on Solaris 11.3
I see lot of warnings when linking OpenSSL 1.1
looking like these

    link_app.solaris-shared
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=.: cc -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DNDEBUG -DOPENSSL_THREADS -DOPENSSL_NO_STATIC_ENGINE -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM 
-DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DGHASH_ASM -DECP_NISTZ256_ASM -DPOLY1305_ASM -DOPENSSLDIR="/usr/local/ssl" -DENGINESDIR="/usr/local/lib/amd64/engines-1.1" -xc99 -m64 -xarch=gen
eric -xstrconst -DL_ENDIAN -xO5 -xdepend -xbuiltin -D_REENTRANT -DFILIO_H -mt -R /usr/local/lib/amd64 -o apps/openssl apps/app_rand.o apps/apps.o apps/asn1pars.o apps/ca.o apps/ciphers.o apps/cms.o apps/crl.o apps/c
rl2p7.o apps/dgst.o apps/dhparam.o apps/dsa.o apps/dsaparam.o apps/ec.o apps/ecparam.o apps/enc.o apps/engine.o apps/errstr.o apps/gendsa.o apps/genpkey.o apps/genrsa.o apps/nseq.o apps/ocsp.o apps/openssl.o apps/op
t.o apps/passwd.o apps/pkcs12.o apps/pkcs7.o apps/pkcs8.o apps/pkey.o apps/pkeyparam.o apps/pkeyutl.o apps/prime.o apps/rand.o apps/rehash.o apps/req.o apps/rsa.o apps/rsautl.o apps/s_cb.o apps/s_client.o apps/s_ser
ver.o apps/s_socket.o apps/s_time.o apps/sess_id.o apps/smime.o apps/speed.o apps/spkac.o apps/srp.o apps/ts.o apps/verify.o apps/version.o apps/x509.o -L. -lssl -L. -lcrypto -lresolv -lsocket -lnsl -ldl -lpthread
ld: warning: relocation warning: R_AMD64_COPY: file ./libcrypto.so: symbol PBEPARAM_it: relocation bound to a symbol with STV_PROTECTED visibility
ld: warning: relocation warning: R_AMD64_COPY: file ./libcrypto.so: symbol PBE2PARAM_it: relocation bound to a symbol with STV_PROTECTED visibility
ld: warning: relocation warning: R_AMD64_COPY: file ./libcrypto.so: symbol PBKDF2PARAM_it: relocation bound to a symbol with STV_PROTECTED visibility

seems the common thing here is that libcrypto.num does this, not sure what
the implied effect is, but seems contradictory to me, one line says export as function
the other one says ! (export as variable instead)

PBEPARAM_it                             1307    1_1_0   EXIST:!EXPORT_VAR_AS_FUNCTION:VARIABLE:
PBEPARAM_it                             1307    1_1_0   EXIST:EXPORT_VAR_AS_FUNCTION:FUNCTION: