[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4589] Resolved: simplifying writing code that is 1.0.x and 1.1.x compatible

Hubert Kario via RT rt at openssl.org
Tue Jun 28 17:52:24 UTC 2016


On Monday 27 June 2016 20:57:50 Salz, Rich via RT wrote:
> > But obviously I was expecting too much...
> 
> Sorry you're not pleased.  Not sure what to say -- you get what you pay for?

and you will not accept pull requests that do that?

> Maybe someone will come up with a "openssl-102-compat" package?

what about Debian CVE-2008-0166 like scenario?

-- 
Regards,
Hubert Kario
Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team
Web: www.cz.redhat.com
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
-- 
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4589
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-dev/attachments/20160628/27ba0c7a/attachment.sig>


More information about the openssl-dev mailing list