[openssl-project] To use or not use the iconv API, and to use or not use other libraries
levitte at openssl.org
Thu Jun 7 15:19:48 UTC 2018
Regarding general use of other libraries, please think carefully before voting, 'cause this *is* tricky. If you have a look, you will see that we *currently* depend on certain standard libraries, such as, for example, libdl. And perhaps we should also mention the pile of libraries used with windows.
In my mind, this makes that more general vote ridiculous, but the matter was brought up to me, and I wasn't going to ignore it, no matter what my personal feelings are.
Richard Levitte <levitte at openssl.org> skrev: (7 juni 2018 13:54:11 CEST)
>This PR has been blocked, forcing a vote:
>Background: we have been sloppy when producing PKCS#12 files, creating
>objects that aren't interoperable. This can only happen with non-UTF8
>input methods, so this PR adds a higher level of control in the
>openssl application, so that it will do the best it can to make sure a
>pass phrase encoded with something other than UTF-8 gets correctly
>re-encoded, and failing that, try and make the user aware that they
>are about to create a non-interoperable object. This triggered the
>use of the iconv API, and in the case of Mac OS/X, the use of the
>separate libiconv library.
>I'm going to make this into two votes, as both topics have come out
>because of this.
>1. A vote about general use of other libraries, limited to standard
> system libraries, which may be platform dependent (I expect
> libiconv on Mac OS/X to be such a library)
>2. A vote about the use of the iconv API
>Please discuss here, no in the vote threads.
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
More information about the openssl-project