Update

[Paul Yang]

> On May 21, 2019, at 22:13, Salz, Rich <rsalz at akamai.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>>  I'd be opposed to this last option without IANA/IETF being on board. By doing so
>    we are effectively no longer compliant with IETF TLS since we're using certain
>    codepoints and version numbers to mean things that IETF/IANA have no visibility
>    of, i.e. we would be doing exactly what Rich was worried about. I don't see
>    IANA/IETF doing this anytime soon.
> 
> For the most part, getting IANA on board requires someone in authority email to tls-registry at iana.org asking for code points and pointing to their spec.

’someone in authority’ here means the author of the spec who is asking for code points?

>