Update

[Salz, Rich]

    >>  I'd be opposed to this last option without IANA/IETF being on board. By doing so
    >    we are effectively no longer compliant with IETF TLS since we're using certain
    >    codepoints and version numbers to mean things that IETF/IANA have no visibility
    >    of, i.e. we would be doing exactly what Rich was worried about. I don't see
    >    IANA/IETF doing this anytime soon.
    > 
    > For the most part, getting IANA on board requires someone in authority email to tls-registry at iana.org asking for code points and pointing to their spec.
    
    ’someone in authority’ here means the author of the spec who is asking for code points?
    

Yes.  Or someone involved with the spec.