3.0 beta 1 milestone

Dmitry Belyavsky beldmit at gmail.com
Thu Sep 17 17:21:50 UTC 2020

Dear Matt,

I think #12891 is a significant problem. I'd suggest fixing it before beta1
or at least discuss it.

Many thanks!

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 3:48 PM Matt Caswell <matt at openssl.org> wrote:

> There's been quite a number of PRs added to the 3.0 beta 1 milestone.
> Within the PRs there are a couple of bug fixes:
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12884
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12874
> IMO these would be really nice to get into beta 1, but they should not
> be considered blockers for it (i.e. if they didn't go in, it shouldn't
> stop us from releasing beta 1).
> There are also some nice-to-have items:
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12777
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12771
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12726
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12669
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12072
> Again - these are nice-to-have, and if they happen to get merged in time
> for beta 1 then great. Otherwise, they should wait for 3.1 (possibly
> things which are just cleanup/minor refactoring could still be done
> within the beta period). So, IMO, these should not be considered
> blockers either.
> So - this leads me to the question - what is the milestone for? Does it
> means these things *must* go in before we can release beta 1? Or does it
> mean we would *like* to get these things in for beta 1?
> I actually don't mind either way - but if its the latter, then I need a
> way of identifying the "must haves". These are the top priority items,
> and at the moment I can't easily track their progress.
> Matt

SY, Dmitry Belyavsky
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-project/attachments/20200917/355808c3/attachment.html>

More information about the openssl-project mailing list