[openssl-users] [openssl-dev] The evolution of the 'master' branch
rsalz at akamai.com
Sun Feb 8 23:21:32 UTC 2015
> The other question would be: assuming there's no replacement for some
> direct field access, are people willing to add the needed functions not only
> into 1.1 but also into 1.0.x, in order to avoid code duplication for end users?
The idea of a 'shim' layer that helps bridge the gap between 1.1 new functions and 1.0.x exposed struct's seems like a great idea and hopefully not a lot of work.
More information about the openssl-users