[openssl-users] 1.0.2f : crypto/opensslv.h : SHLIB_VERSION_NUMBER is still "1.0.0"

[REIX, Tony]

Hi,

Looking at crypto/opensslv.h of version 1.0.2f, it says:
     # define SHLIB_VERSION_NUMBER "1.0.0"

Shouldn't it be 1.0.2 ??


On AIX, we provide previous versions (32 & 64 bots) of libssl.so and libcrypto.so , for compatibility, like:
libssl.so.0.9.7
libssl.so.0.9.8
libssl.so.1.0.0

and, for 1.0.1r as an example, we deliver libssl.a which contains (for 32bits):
ar tv /opt/freeware/lib/libssl.a
rwxr-xr-x     0/0     802481 Feb  2 16:55 2016 libssl.so.1.0.1
rw-r--r--     0/0     414263 Feb  2 16:58 2016 libssl.so.0.9.7
rw-r--r--     0/0     597413 Feb  2 16:58 2016 libssl.so.0.9.8
rwxr-xr-x     0/0     653177 Feb  2 16:58 2016 libssl.so.1.0.0

Shouldn't I provide the 1.0.2f version as: libssl.so.1.0.2 ?
And thus,  SHLIB_VERSION_NUMBER shouldn't it be set as "1.0.2" in crypto/opensslv.h ?

Thanks

Cordialement,

Tony Reix

Bull - ATOS
IBM Coop Architect & Technical Leader
Office : +33 (0) 4 76 29 72 67
1 rue de Provence - 38432 Échirolles - France
www.atos.net<https://mail.ad.bull.net/owa/redir.aspx?C=PvphmPvCZkGrAgHVnWGsdMcDKgzl_dEIsM6rX0g4u4v8V81YffzBGkWrtQeAXNovd3ttkJL8JIc.&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.atos.net%2f>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20160203/c338eadb/attachment-0001.html>