[openssl-users] openssl 1.0.2g build fails with 'no-comp' or 'no-comp no-bio' configure options?
pgnet.dev at gmail.com
Thu Mar 10 18:44:23 UTC 2016
On 03/10/2016 10:19 AM, PGNetwork Dev wrote:
>> ./config no-comp ...
>> subsequent 'make' fails
>> enc.c:(.text+0x1253): undefined reference to `BIO_f_zlib'
> Adding one or both of no-zlib no-zlib-dynamic should handle that.
My read of
"no-comp Disables compression independent of zlib. OPENSSL_NO_COMP
will be defined in the OpenSSL headers."
is that this disables compression methods OTHER than zlib.
Is the intent, instead, that it disables ALL compression, REGARDLESS of
the presence/setting of zlib?
> I've not built with no-bio, suspect it is much more intimately
> entangled and may not be practical in 1.0.2g; there's been a lot of
> work done in master to clean up various optional exclusions, I think
> no-bio is expected to be working there.
Ah, I see the diffs in the 1.0.2 -> 1.1.0 changelog at
More information about the openssl-users