[openssl-users] OpenSSL version 1.0.2l published

[Viktor Dukhovni]

> On Jun 1, 2017, at 10:54 AM, Wouter Verhelst <wouter.verhelst at fedict.be> wrote:
> 
> It might be useful to make that point at the start of the CHANGES file,
> then. Currently, it just says "Changes between X.Y.Zx and X.Y.Zy
> [date]". While that doesn't claim to be complete, the simple word
> "CHANGES" invokes the idea of a changelog, which should be complete --
> and this file is not. If it's not meant to be, fine -- but then it
> doesn't hurt to say so, and it would alleviate some confusion.

Sure, would "Major changes" be sufficient?  This is essentially
a RELEASE_NOTES file, not a comprehensive change log, which is
subsumed by git.

-- 
	Viktor.