[openssl-users] Introduce a TLS application library - a proposal on the overall OpenSSL code structure
David von Oheimb
David.von.Oheimb at siemens.com
Tue Sep 5 12:12:37 UTC 2017
Back on 13 May 2016 I had proposed by email to a couple of people
including Rich Salz
a third library level (on top of crypto and ssl) with more high-level,
His response was:
> That is a really interesting idea. Please bring this up on openssl-dev mailing list.
Then I posted that by mistake unfortunately not in the right forum but at:
I quote my post here for convenience:
> So far, the OpenSSL code has essentially a three-level structure with
> a hierarchy of two libraries and a command-line application at the top:
> In the apps/ directory there is various generally useful code like
> handling crypto-related files and messages, general TLS client/server
> and CA functionality, implementing parts of protocols like S/MIME,
> CRL, and OCSP, and certainly more to come.
> While this code serves as a model for using the libraries and it can
> be used in a limited way by invoking the openssl application binary,
> it cannot be re-used directly. Other applications that need similar
> functionality need to copy/re-implement and then maintain portions of
> that code.
> On the other hand, the libraries contain some code that is actually
> too high-level for them, for instance the minimal HTTP client as part
> of the crypto library (crypto/ocsp/ocsp_ht.c).
> It would be very helpful to introduce a further level in the hierarchy
> consisting of a more application-oriented library:
> libtlsapps <-- new (with tentative name here)
> Then all more high-level and application support functionality will go
> there. This would make much of the generally useful code that so far
> resides in the apps/ folder directly accessible to other
> applications at the programming level, i.e., in the form of a
> library/API, with all the re-usability advantages that this brings. It
> would also relieve libcrypto from more application-/high-level topics
> like HTTP.
> This library would also form an ideal condensation point for further
> high-level uses of TLS that may in the future get integrated with
> OpenSSL, like CMP and EST implementations.
I recently learned that LibreSSL <https://www.libressl.org/>
already/meanwhile has something in this direction:
* libtls <https://man.openbsd.org/?query=tls_init>: a new TLS library,
designed to make it easier to write foolproof applications
I believe this would be of great benefit also for OpenSSL itself.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the openssl-users