[openssl-users] RNG behavior by default
Steffen Nurpmeso
steffen at sdaoden.eu
Mon Jan 7 22:21:39 UTC 2019
Jakob Bohm via openssl-users wrote in <07f4dea3-1a62-0c8c-76a4-cbe56abc8\
70a at wisemo.com>:
|On 07/01/2019 22:31, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> Good evening.
|>
|> Jakob Bohm via openssl-users wrote in <95bceb59-b299-015a-f9c2-e2487a699\
|> 8ad at wisemo.com>:
|>|Small corrections below:
|>| ...
|
|Note that I do not represent the project at all, I am just another user
|trying to help you.
Surprise! Indeed i do see your name only once in the commits!
So now, what to do? What is due? Congratulations, or even an
excuse? I had a very false impression indeed. Excuse this miss
of mine, please.
|As such, I cannot really respond to your criticism of other project
|aspects, some of which I myself don't like either, while others are
|obvious to me as someone who has more or less followed along since this
|was a two-man Australian project.
Then you lead me by more than a decade in respect to "following"
the project. (I only saw, otherwise offline, the headers and
libraries fly by.) (And in my granted lengthy text i thought
about changing my ARC4 thing to ChaCha, and not feed the bytes of
the pool as such, but run a Blake2 digest on top of it, and feed
the output of that. For now, however, this ARC4 PRNG, and then
also well seeded, is really good enough for my purpose(s).)
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)
More information about the openssl-users
mailing list