More GitHub labels

Dmitry Belyavsky beldmit at
Thu Sep 10 06:26:52 UTC 2020

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:20 AM Dr. Matthias St. Pierre <
Matthias.St.Pierre at> wrote:

> > ... I think we should change that. This does not mean that a reviewer
> who made a change request
> > two months ago and lost interest is forced to re-review, only that such
> stale reviews must be dismissed
> > explicitly, if the reviewer does not respond to a re-review request
> within a certain time period.
> I would refine this procedure as follows: the team member who intends to
> do the merge (the "merger"),
> needs to issue re-review requests for all unresolved change requests
> (there is a spinning button next the
> name of the reviewer to do this). The person who receives the re-review
> request can either dismiss its
> review or indicate that it intends to review within x hours. Otherwise,
> the merger can dismiss the stale review.
> Sorry, it seems a bit overengineering for me.
I'd prefer a procedure with explicit hold and explanation in the comments.

SY, Dmitry Belyavsky
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the openssl-project mailing list