[openssl-users] Fwd: Itanium problem

[Rongliang Lei]

Normal WIN64 works fine so far

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson <steve at openssl.org>
wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015, John Foley wrote:
>
> > I'm impressed you were able to do a FIPS build for Windows x64.  I
> > didn't think this was possible.  ;-)
> >
>
> WIN64 uses PIC and there aren't any relocation issues so in some ways it's
> less trouble than WIN32.
>
> > This looks like the hash that FINGERPRINT_premain() spits out when the
> > signature hasn't been embedded into the binary.  You may want to confirm
> > the signature is embedded during the build process.
> >
>
> Yes that's the cause. Itanium wasn't a platform that was specifically
> included
> during the validation so the build system might not handle it properly and
> the
> result most likely wouldn't be validated anyway.
>
> Do normal WIN64 binaries work?
>
> Steve.
> --
> Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
> Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org
> _______________________________________________
> openssl-users mailing list
> To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20150417/1450005b/attachment.html>